Date:

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:21 -0800 (PST)

From:

"Commando Dave" <bulzidave@yahoo.com>  

Subject:

RE: US Design Patent Des.400,941

To:

"Tamkin, Greg" <Tamkin.Greg@dorsey.com>

CC:

BillF@SeedIP.com, "Osman, Lee" <Osman.Lee@dorsey.com>

 

 


Mr. Tamkin:

 

Thank you for your reply advising me that Nautilus is

still interested in resolving the dispute.  However,

by being unwilling to agree to a waiver enabling me to

be represented by Seed IP, Nautilus is going against

its Code of Business Conducts and Ethics.

http://www.nautilus.com/global/content.jsp?FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302024265&bmUID=1130254794570

 

 

Item Eight of Nautilus’ Code of Business Conducts and

Ethics, “Fair Dealing” starts with:

 

“The Company is committed to promoting the values of

honesty, integrity and fairness in the conduct of its

business and sustaining a work environment that

fosters mutual respect, openness and individual

integrity. Employees, officers and directors are

expected to deal honestly and fairly with each other

and with the Company's customers, suppliers,

competitors and other third parties...”

 

The provision ends with:

 

“...otherwise take unfair advantage of anyone through

manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged

information or any other unfair-dealing practice.”

 

In my October 27, 2005 eMail to you, I wrote:

 

“...The waiver was the point of contention with the

old StairMaster; precisely the reason we are at this

impasse today. Trying to reach an amicable resolution

without a waiver, Nautilus maintains the same unfair

advantage...” 

 

This dispute would not have arisen if StairMaster

adhered to its corporate policy in 1998.

http://bulzi.net/policy2.html  I have been impressed

by Nautilus’ willingness to resolve a matter created

by the unethical business conduct of former

StairMaster executives.

http://bulzimg.net/lastletter.html However, I continue

to be perplexed by Nautilus’ unwillingness to execute

a waiver, not to mention the need for one, based on:

 

1) Seed & Berry was dissolved in December 1999 and

Seed IP is not the firm that represented StairMaster;

 

2) The Seed & Berry attorney that handled

StairMaster’s portfolio has no affiliation with Seed

IP;

 

3) The Seed & Berry attorneys who represented me have

no affiliation with Seed IP.

 

Lastly, speaking of waivers, per Item 11 of Nautilus,

Inc.’s Code of Business Conducts and Ethics,

“Waivers,” please advise if the provision of Item

Eight has been waived by a resolution of the Company's

Board of Directors for the Nautilus officer advising

you in this matter.

 

Please confirm receipt.  Thank you.

 

Standing by;

 

Commando Dave

Bulzi Marketing Group

http://BulziMG.net

253.222.3091